October 7th, 2008 @ 2:45pm by Manila Ryce
The following is an article pieced together from a few emails I received from Toby Heaps, National Media Coordinator for the Nader campaign.
Arbitrary “Internal Judgment” - The Exclusion of Choice and Suppression of Democracy
In a recent WSJ/NBC national poll, Ralph Nader pulls 5 percent. Contrast that to the most recent Gallup national poll, where Nader polls a fraction of one percent. Why the big difference? Answer: Gallup, the 800-pound gorilla of the polling world, doesn’t list Ralph Nader as one of the Presidential candidates in the primary polling question.
Are you kidding me? No. We are not kidding you. And guess who the Commission on Presidential Debates depends on to do its polling to see which Presidential candidates get to debate before tens of millions of Americans tonight in Nashville? You guessed it: Gallup.
I called Frank Newport, the editor-in-chief at Gallup (pictured above left). You can call him too at 609-924-9600 or e-mail him directly at frank_newport@gallup.com.
“Is there an objective standard you use to keep Ralph off your primary polling question?” I asked Newport. “No,” He replied. “We use our internal judgment to decide.” Whoa! Gallup’s “internal judgment” keeps Ralph Nader out of their polling.
So, I tried again: “Any ballpark levels of support Gallup looks to as a threshold?” Newport replied again, “No.”
Again, it was just subject to unidentified “internal judgment criteria.”
There are some polling agencies — such as Ipsos/McClatchey and CNN/Opinion Research Corp. — that include all the major third party candidates. Not Gallup.




