By Manila Ryce
Published Sunday, April 23rd, 2006, 6:18 pm
Filed under: Society/Culture: Racism, Society/Culture
Well it’s finally happened. The official brand of Run-DMC have turned racist. Retailing at $250, the Adidas “Yellow Series” Y1 Huf is kicking up controversy. Not because they cost so much, when they’re probably sewn together for pennies in China, but because they depict an offensive stereotype. On the tongue of the shoe is a caricature of an Asian face complete with buck teeth, bowl-cut hair, and pig nose. The image was originally designed by US graffiti artist Barry McGee (AKA Twist), who is half Chinese, and was used for the cover of his exhibition catalog. Why Adidas decided it was the perfect image to place on their shoes is still a puzzle to me. An Adidas spokeswoman said the company “appreciates all self-expression” and “had no intention of offending any individual or group”.
In my opinion, by using an image such as this the artist confronts a negative stereotype quite boldly, taking away its power and using it against itself. It’s a pre-emptive confrontation which takes easy ammo away from the enemy. McGee’s patrons are familiar with his background and body of work, enabling them to have a clear interpretation of this character. It’s the equivalent of an African-American artist using a blackface Sambo character to take on the issue of race in a rather controversial, yet condemning manner. Detournement, using an element to communicate a different message from the original, is not uncommon in the art world. However, for a faceless corporation like Adidas to slap this racist image on a product is reckless at best. No longer is your audience a small group of people who are in on the joke, but rather anyone who has $250 to spare. The image is taken out of the context McGee created, and therefore loses its anti-racist message altogether. It’s no longer symbolic of the battle over racial identity for an artist, but rather a funny character meant to turn a profit for the pockets of a business. One could question whether Adidas is using a little detournement of their own. Whatever their motivation, they definately need some sensitivity training.
3 Responses to “Adidas Says, “Oh! So Solly!””
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
- Cyndy on Colbert Beats Down Dinesh D'Souza
- Ryan Moon on The Colbert Report: Barack Obama Isn't…
- Byron D Church on The best of Abbie Hoffman
- Chris on Israeli Occupation Of Palestine Causin…
- bijan on Letter to Bush on Gaza Crisis: By Ralp…
Recent Posts
Action Alerts
Blogroll
- Allison Kilkenny
- Bill Noxid: Paying Attention
- Blue man in a Red district
- BoRev.Net
- BuelahMan's Redstate Revolt
- Dandelion Salad
- DC's Digression
- deadissue
- Dissident Voice
- Flumesday
- FobbDeep
- Freida Bee
- KABOBfest
- MeInAction
- Mock, Paper, Scissors
- Naeem's Blog
- News of the Restless
- Operation Itch
- Phydeaux Speaks
- Politics and Anarchism
- Polycentric Order
- Raising Yousuf, Unplugged
- Revolt Today
- Socialism or Your Money Back
- The Barefoot Bum
- The Intelligence Daily
- The Underground Radicals
- The World According to Ash
- The World Socialist
- Treehugger
- Truthdig
- Underground Media: Reloaded
Websites
- After Downing Street
- Alive in Baghdad
- Anarchism Today
- Anarchist Archives
- Axis of Justice
- Black Agenda Report
- Chomsky Torrents
- Chomsky.Info
- COA News
- CorpWatch
- CounterPunch
- Democracy Now!
- Electronic Intifada
- FAIR
- Fair Vote
- Free Gaza
- Free Rice
- Free Speech Radio News
- Free Speech TV Community
- From Occupied Palestine
- Glassbooth
- Global Voices for Justice
- Greenpeace International
- If Americans Knew
- Kiva - Loans that change lives
- KPFK Pacifica Radio
- Marxists Internet Archive
- OpEdNews
- Parecon
- PeaceCandidates.com
- Prison Radio
- Prison Sucks
- Ridgeway/Ng
- Socialist Party USA
- The Palestine Chronicle
- The United States Labor Party
- They Rule
- Union of Concerned Scientists
- venezuelanalysis
- Willie Nelson PRI
- ZNet
Artists
-
Search
-
Subscribe
Posts Comments Via Email 
Sponsors
- Office Space in Mission Valley
Two professional buildings located in San Diego's Mission Valley!
- Office Space in Rancho Bernardo
Elegant office space and event hosting at the Rancho Bernard Courtyard
- Executive Recruitment Services
Cornerstone offers your retail of I.T. company the edge it needs through professional recruitment
- Office Space in Mission Valley
-
Advertise

I have mixed reactions on this one. On the one hand, yes it’s racist when put out of context.
But on the other hand it means that the executives who were making the decisions left the creative decisions up to the designers and artists, and trusted them to make something that people would like. I doubt the people who designed the shoe had any racist intentions, and the board members who okayed it didn’t understand it, but trusted the designers that “the kids will love it”.
I want more execs like those who okayed this shoe, because it means that they take less creative control over their product and leave it up to the artists. Movies, particularly animation, is plagued by execs who don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about making demands and suggestions that go against the creative people’s wishes. It would be better if the execs worried more about the finances and less about the creative output.
So while the shoe may be offensive when taken out of context, I’m happy that for once the execs in charge took a chance and let the artists have control. Because you know full well as soon as the PR chairman saw that shoe he had a heart-attack.
04/27/06 at 1:38 pm
[…] Perhaps it’s just me, but I imagine that Tamir put his feet on his desk during the interview while wearing these sneakers. […]
10/18/06 at 2:27 am
The funny thing is that, the design was made for HUF SF the design wasn’t even adidas doing, they do artists series all the time. They don’t care they usually just do well, anyways these are hot and i want the shoes
01/30/07 at 10:24 am