Becuase Everything Else Sucks

Study Finds ‘The Daily Show’ is More Substantive Than Mainstream News

By Manila Ryce
Published Sunday, October 8th, 2006, 1:27 am
Filed under: Entertainment, Society/Culture, US Politics

A study conducted by IU assistant professor of telecommunications Julia R. Fox of Indiana University has found that Jon Stewart’s ‘The Daily Show’ offers news coverage that is just as substantive as traditional newscasts. The professor and a couple of graduate students compared The Daily Show’s coverage of the 2004 Democratic and Republican conventions as well as the first presidential debate of the fall campaign with that delivered by programs like World News Tonight and CBS Evening News.

Professor Fox, whose name is mildly ironic to me, says that the proportion of stories per half hour were actually greater in the Daily Show than that of mainstream broadcasts devoted entirely to the election campaign. Fox verified that “the broadcast network news stories about the presidential election were significantly shorter, on average, than were The Daily Show with Jon Stewart stories.”

Using the entire half-hour programs as the basis of analysis yielded the same results: there was just as much substance to The Daily Show’s coverage as there was on the network news. And The Daily Show was much funnier, with less of the hype—references to photo ops, political endorsements, and polls—that typically overshadows substantive coverage on network news, according to the study.

So does this mean the Daily Show is more of a real news show than the mainstream news? Yes, but it still doesn’t mean the Daily Show is actually a news show. Rather, it exposes the sorry state of the media in our country. The fact that a self-proclaimed “fake news program” is more of a legitimate source than the mainstream news is appalling. Of course it’s also noteworthy to mention previous studies which say that viewers of the Daily Show are 78 percent more likely than the average adult to have attended college for four or more years, and more informed on election issues than people who read newspapers or watch TV news. Satirical or not, the Daily Show is informative and those with enough intelligence know it. Now if we could only raise the standard of our news programs to match or surpass that of our comedy shows.

source 1
source 2

4 Responses to “Study Finds ‘The Daily Show’ is More Substantive Than Mainstream News”

  1. You got dugg! If you guys are members over at Digg.com then I suggest you go and digg it!

  2. […] It seems that the White House isn’t the only organization pumping fake news out of Iraq. For the past month, Iraqis have been tuning in to a program titled after a slang Arabic term, “Hurry Up, He’s Dead”. The host of the comedy show, Saaed Khalifa, looks like a bad Bootsy Collins impersonator with a giant Afro wig and star-shaped sunglasses. While Khalifa’s fake news show is aesthetically very different from the American “Daily Show”, its satirical format is very much the same. Each 20 minute show is broadcast on Al Sharqiya, an Iraqi satellite station. […]

  3. […] Knowledge of issues such as current events, the government, and politics were assessed on a 12-item scale. The study stated that, “Bush supporters had significantly less knowledge about current issues, government and politics than those who supported Kerry.” Similarly, another study has shown that viewers of the left-leaning Daily Show are generally well-educated and more informed on election issues than the average American. […]

  4. […] “The Daily News” beats regular news […]

Leave a Reply

Tired of filing this information out everytime you leave a comment at the Largest Minority? Why not register as a user? You also get full access to our forum!

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>