Becuase Everything Else Sucks

Hillary + Diebold = New Hampshire Win

By Manila Ryce
Published Friday, January 11th, 2008, 5:53 am
Filed under: Society/Culture: Civil Unrest, Science and Technology, Society/Culture: Law/Order, Society/Culture, US Politics

Hillary has not only taken policy advice from the Neocons, but advice on how to “win” elections as well. Exit polls are never wrong, yet they predicted that Gore would win Florida in 2000, that Kerry would win Ohio in 2004, and that Obama would win New Hampshire last week. What’s the variable that ties all of these anomalies together? Diebold.

Only 20% of New Hampshire’s primary ballots were counted by hand. The other 80% were counted exclusively by Diebold machines. Obama secured his predicted lead on the hand-counted ballots, but Diebold-counted ballots ended up giving the lead to Hillary. Stalin once said, “The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.” Or was it John Kerry who said that after he conceded the 2004 election? Well whoever said it, it’s Kucinich who has had the courage above his slighted contenders to request that the New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner recount Tuesday’s election.

“I am not making this request in the expectation that a recount will significantly affect the number of votes that were cast on my behalf,” Kucinich stressed in a letter to Secretary of State William M. Gardner. But, “Serious and credible reports, allegations, and rumors have surfaced in the past few days…It is imperative that these questions be addressed in the interest of public confidence in the integrity of the election process and the election machinery – not just in New Hampshire, but in every other state that conducts a primary election.”

Also, the reports, allegations, and rumors regarding possible vote-count irregularities have been further fueled by the stunning disparities between various “independent” pre-election polls and the actual election results,” Kucinich wrote. “The integrity, credibility, and value of independent polling are separate issues, but they appear to be relevant in the context of New Hampshire’s votes.”

He added, “Ever since the 2000 election – and even before – the American people have been losing faith in the belief that their votes were actually counted. This recount isn’t about who won 39% of 36% or even 1%. It’s about establishing whether 100% of the voters had 100% of their votes counted exactly the way they cast them.”

Kucinich, who drew about 1.4% of the New Hampshire Democratic primary vote, wrote, “This is not about my candidacy or any other individual candidacy. It is about the integrity of the election process.” No other Democratic candidate, he noted, has stepped forward to question or pursue the claims being made.

“New Hampshire is in the unique position to address – and, if so determined, rectify – these issues before they escalate into a massive, nationwide suspicion of the process by which Americans elect their President. Based on the controversies surrounding the Presidential elections in 2004 and 2000, New Hampshire is in a prime position to investigate possible irregularities and to issue findings for the benefit of the entire nation,” Kucinich wrote in his letter.

“Without an official recount, the voters of New Hampshire and the rest of the nation will never know whether there are flaws in our electoral system that need to be identified and addressed at this relatively early point in the Presidential nominating process,” said Kucinich, who is campaigning in Michigan this week in advance of next Tuesday’s Presidential primary in that state.

You can contact New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner at (603)-271-3242 or at Elections@sos.state.nh.us. Every transfer of these ballots in the chain of custody from person to person must also be documented and proven that nobody else could have accessed them.

It’s clear from Disney’s lock out of Kucinich from the previous debates that corporations have too much control over our electoral process. They have the power to manipulate everything we see and know about this world, and use that power frequently to their advantage. Government is supposed to check private power, but when the so-called top-tier candidates are owned by this Mickey Mouse operation, there is no accountability. Since they’ve failed, it’s up to you and me. Kucinich can’t do it alone. ABC and Diebold would never have robbed us in broad daylight if they didn’t think they could get away with it. They’ve crushed democracy in Florida, Ohio, and now New Hampshire. Don’t let your state be next. Demand a recount.

h/t to BradBlog for bringing this to my attention

6 Responses to “Hillary + Diebold = New Hampshire Win”

  1. I’m glad you wrote about this, and I’m ecstatic that Kucinich has the balls to challenge it in the open. Rigged elections are suspected everywhere else in the world, it’s utterly naive to think they can’t happen here. Sadly, this is a topic that will probably never make it to the mainstream media. But Dennis has proven yet again that he is the one true Democrat running. I will never understand why the so-called progressive blogosphere has refused to embrace him and still cling to corporate puppets like Obama and Edwards.

  2. America needs a good kick in the pants for allowing Diebold to continue riggin votes and deceiving the entire political process. Have no sympathy, merely disdain.

  3. I would mandate a paper ballot for every state in the Union. The tally could still be manipulated, but it would be more difficult. A paper trail as backup is a much better system.

  4. It is interested that NBC went to court to prevent Kucinich appearing on the debate in Nevada. One on the reason for this censorship is that they are afraid that Kucinich will talk about what happen in New Hampshire. The polls were actually correct; indeed there was a fraud benefiting the so-called surprised winner. Eventually the American people will know the truth. And when that happens the propensity will clearly go toward the leader with the sound judgment not the divider. Kucinich really believe that there was a fraud. He supports this belief with hard cash, by paying for the recounts that is now in order. Kucinich believes that Barrack Obama has won the New Hampshire primary; And Hillary Clinton came in second, if the machine were accurate. Technicians who support the Diebold machine were allowed to break the security seal and to change the memory card on the machine during the Election Day under the pretense that the diebold machine broke down. There seems to be evidence that the surprise winner got a bump of +4.5% and the second candidate’s count was subtracting by 2.5%

  5. Diebold has had a long history of manipulating the vote count, and has been chastised for their insufficient safeguards in the past (California for one). The 2000 election opened everyones eyes to the “behind the scene” shenanigans that takes place in every election. It is time for election reform and holding our elected officials to the same rules and regulations we are acountable for. It is also time for laws to protect the people over corporations. When did the U.S. decide that corporations had more rights than the individual? And why do we let politicians side with corporate interests over that of the nation?

  6. I would like to write and say what a great job you did on this.

Leave a Reply

Tired of filing this information out everytime you leave a comment at the Largest Minority? Why not register as a user? You also get full access to our forum!

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>