I addressed this issue the other day after Hillary’s interview with Olbermann, but more has been said since then and people are not nearly as outraged as they should be.

John McCain’s “bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran” remark was nothing compared to Hillary’s recent comments about wiping Iran off the map.

To the pseudo-liberals who say they’ll vote for Hillary if she’s the Democratic nominee, I have one question: Are you fucking insane? Voting for any corporate candidate the Dems throw at us is exactly how we got where we are right now. Clinton has repeatedly stated that she has no problem annihilating millions of Iranian civilians with American nukes for the sake of Israeli security. Let that sink in for a bit.

Is the mere possibility of a weapons program reason enough to attack Iran (as Hillary believes it was for Iraq), or will simply supporting resistance groups like Hezbollah and Hamas be considered enough of a threat to Israel to justify a nuclear strike? If she becomes president, Mrs. Clinton will undoubtedly hold on to her false claim that Iran is seeking nuclear weapons and must be stopped.

Whatever reason Hillary uses to justify hostilities, a nuclear strike will make the 1.3 million dead in Iraq look like a minor pre-show to the main event of World War III. Even Henry Kissinger, who has recently promoted nuclear weapons abolition, is more in line with liberals on this issue. Hillary is outright threatening a non-aggressive nation with nuclear obliteration, in defiance of the UN Charter, and so-called liberals are still willing to vote for her?

Threatening any sort of military action against Iran is a war crime, plain and simple. If Democrats actually had the morals they accuse Neocons of lacking they’d rally to put Clinton in a prison cell, not the Oval Office.