By Manila Ryce
Published Monday, May 5th, 2008, 4:40 pm
Filed under: Videos: Political, Videos: Other, Society/Culture: Law/Order, Society/Culture: Art, Videos, Society/Culture, US Politics
May 1st was Labor Day (or International Workers’ Day) for the rest of the world, in which the achievements of the labor movement were celebrated. However, Labor Day in the United States does not fall on May 1st. It was placed in September so that the workers’ holiday would not be observed in its proper place, and so that non-labor related May Day festivities might overshadow the significance of the date. In fact, to further quell the threat that May Day posed to the ruling elite, President Eisenhower proclaimed May 1st to be both “Loyalty Day” and “Law Day”.
Every action taken by the US Congress must be heavily scrutinized within the understanding that business owns our government. Not only is the United States “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today”, as Doctor King once noted, but our business-run society is also the greatest purveyor of anti-labor practices. Much of American foreign policy is even dedicated to the subjugation of workers outside our borders. We control the world (and when I say “we” you know I mean “they”), because our nation still benefits from slavery.
On April 24th, both the US House and Senate introduced versions of Orphan Works legislation. An orphan work is an original work which is protected within its term of copyright, but whose creator is unknown to someone wanting to use the work. The Orphaned Work bills allow for any commercial, for-profit user to profit off of an already copyrighted work. Granted, large corporations already reap the rewards of the faceless artists employed by their studios, but this new legislation allows for these same corporations to use the work of ALL visual artists. Whether you choose to work for a corporation is no longer a prerequisite for your work to be exploited by them.
The bills do state that the commercial user must first perform a “reasonably diligent search” for the artist before they can use their work, but what constitutes a “reasonably diligent search” and where does one perform that search? Congress seems to think that a private for-profit registry is the best way to search for authors. Yes, privatization strikes again.
Not only would it be virtually impossible for any artist to register every piece they’ve ever created in their lifetime, but paying a registration fee for each piece would kill the ability of all artists to make a living. If an artist does not clear all secondary licensing rights through at least two of these databases then their work will be considered orphaned.
If an artist does happen to spot their work turned into a cartoon, toys, furniture, textile prints, greeting cards, etc, then the commercial user is required to pay reasonable compensation to the owner, but avoids liability for copyright infringement. If this bill passes, a corporation like Disney would have the choice of whether to hire an illustrator to create an image or simply steal one that’s copyrighted after they perform a “reasonably diligent search” for its creator. If they decide to steal a copyrighted work, and the creator of that image later appears, they are only required to pay them the same amount they would have originally paid the hired artist.
In short, there is a clear financial benefit to stealing copyrighted work, but no financial punishment for getting caught. In fact, even with the current protections of copyright law, corporations already do steal copyrighted work and simply pay the damages. If liability for copyright infringement is no longer a factor, corporate disregard for copyright will undoubtedly become the norm.
Workers of the world, we visual artists are currently alone in our opposition to this bill. Please stand in solidarity with us. Do not let Congress take away the rights everyone has to their creations. Sign a petition at the Illustrators Partnership of America to notify the Senate and House that you oppose these bipartisan pro-business bills. If you’ve ever doodled or uploaded photos to the web, this bill affects you too. Let Congress know that it’s unacceptable for business to further burden the backs of labor through our own government.
After signing the petition, you can also call, write, or email your representatives directly by getting their info from these sites:
US Senators
US House Reps
6 Responses to “The Theft of Art – Show Your Opposition to Orphaned Works Legislation”
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
- Wizen on Family Guy Takes Shots at Cheney and B…
- Tom on The Simpsons on the Environment
- ffkjg on Family Guy – Will Smith’s Nice Cle…
- Galueflassami on Brown & Black Democratic Forum: Kucini…
- Bernie on Two Israeli Workers Were Warned of 9/1…
Recent Posts
Action Alerts
Blogroll
- Allison Kilkenny
- Bill Noxid: Paying Attention
- Blue man in a Red district
- BoRev.Net
- BuelahMan's Redstate Revolt
- Dandelion Salad
- DC's Digression
- deadissue
- Dissident Voice
- Flumesday
- FobbDeep
- Freida Bee
- KABOBfest
- MeInAction
- Mock, Paper, Scissors
- Naeem's Blog
- News of the Restless
- Operation Itch
- Phydeaux Speaks
- Politics and Anarchism
- Polycentric Order
- Raising Yousuf, Unplugged
- Revolt Today
- Socialism or Your Money Back
- The Barefoot Bum
- The Intelligence Daily
- The Underground Radicals
- The World According to Ash
- The World Socialist
- Treehugger
- Truthdig
- Underground Media: Reloaded
Websites
- After Downing Street
- Alive in Baghdad
- Anarchism Today
- Anarchist Archives
- Axis of Justice
- Black Agenda Report
- Chomsky Torrents
- Chomsky.Info
- COA News
- CorpWatch
- CounterPunch
- Democracy Now!
- Electronic Intifada
- FAIR
- Fair Vote
- Free Gaza
- Free Rice
- Free Speech Radio News
- Free Speech TV Community
- From Occupied Palestine
- Glassbooth
- Global Voices for Justice
- Greenpeace International
- If Americans Knew
- Kiva - Loans that change lives
- KPFK Pacifica Radio
- Marxists Internet Archive
- OpEdNews
- Parecon
- PeaceCandidates.com
- Prison Radio
- Prison Sucks
- Ridgeway/Ng
- Socialist Party USA
- The United States Labor Party
- They Rule
- Union of Concerned Scientists
- venezuelanalysis
- Willie Nelson PRI
- ZNet
Artists
-
Search
-
Subscribe
Posts Comments Via Email 
Sponsors
- Office Space in Mission Valley
Two professional buildings located in San Diego's Mission Valley!
- Office Space in Rancho Bernardo
Elegant office space and event hosting at the Rancho Bernard Courtyard
- Executive Recruitment Services
Cornerstone offers your retail of I.T. company the edge it needs through professional recruitment
- Office Space in Mission Valley
-
Advertise

Thanks for the heads up. I’ll spread this message.
05/5/08 at 9:54 pm
I also wanted to thank you for the heads up. As an artist this bill seriously worries me, though it in no way surprises me that the government wants to pass more legislation allowing corporations even more loopholes to make money by taking it away from the individual.
05/7/08 at 9:03 am
That was a truly thought provoking video. Nice work.
05/7/08 at 6:03 pm
This bill is definitely disturbing, and certainly something that needs to be watched. However, one thing that may put your minds at rest is the fact that this bill has repeatedly been brought before the Senate as well as the House over the last decade, and has yet to garner a single supporter, (aside from the guy who wrote it, of course.)
I highly doubt it will be much different this time, but again, a letter to your congressman couldn’t hurt.
05/7/08 at 9:17 pm
I understand your position on the orphaned works bill. There is also another compelling side to the argument.
A growing number of artists employ employ already existing works in their art, through remixing and other techniques. Since the vast majority of works have almost no commercial value after a period of time (Lessig cites a figure of 7 years), aritsts ought to be free to incorporate these cultural artifacts into their artwork.
However, if artists fear the bizzarely huge copyright infringement costs for ever using a work without paying for it (considering they will often not be able to find a copyright holder), artists will refrain from art that transforms and comments on older works.
A vibrant culture demands that artists build upon and transform older cultural production. Overly punative copyright law locks down that kind of creativity and flexibility. This bill is an attempt to find a balance between artists’ right to compensation and artists’ right to freely engage in the culture around them.
Clearly, you don’t think that this is the right balance. Can you suggest an alternative?
05/8/08 at 2:30 pm
@Nathan
Detournement, using an element to communicate a different message from the original, is not uncommon in the art world and is already protected under fair use law. If you check out my own personal site, you’ll notice I’ve parodied well-known works myself. Fair use allows for limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the original artist. What you’re describing is already legal, and has been for centuries. This bill frankly has nothing to do with an artist’s “right to freely engage in the culture around them”. Artists are not restricted by current copyright laws but business is, and that’s who this bill is for.
05/8/08 at 3:03 pm